Thursday, November 11th

Wait, I'm Not Done Yet With My Election Analysis!

At the beginning of this election season, I tried to do something crazy: I tried to remain undecided until I got to the voting booth. The thing that really made me decide to do this was my anger at the Democratic Party activists who blamed Ralph Nader for the "loss" of Al Gore in 2000, and decided to challenge Nader's right to be on the ballots in many states. The 2.88 million people, or 2.7% who voted for Ralph Nader in 2000, they figured, would have voted for Tipper Gore's husband if Nader was not on the ballot. What they failed to understand is that maybe these 2.88 million people- and, if you include the 1.03 million, or 1% who voted for the other third party candidates, which makes 3.91 million or 3.7% of the country, voted because they refused to vote for either Bush, Jr. or Al Whore. This bloc of voters tipped the election, and the Democrats can't stand it.

There are a huge number of people, in fact the majority of people in the United States, who are eligible to vote but abstain because they do not want to endorse either major party candidate. When presented with a credible alternative who is allowed to participate in the debates, like Ross Perot was in 1992, people will come out to vote. Perot got 19.74 million votes, or 18.9% in 1992 when he was new on the scene, and 8.08 million votes, or 8.4% in 1996. If Perot hadn't mysteriously quit the race for a few days because Bush, Sr. was "messing with his daughter's wedding," he might have won a la Jesse Ventura in 1998. I believe that almost all of the Nader voters were mostly young liberals who grew up during the PMRC's reign of terror and who could not stand to bring themselves to vote for Al Gore.

These older hippie Democrats chased away my vote by claiming that the world was going to end just because Bush, Jr. is reelected so I needed to vote for Kerry otherwise I was either some sort of non-liberal caveman (i.e. a Republican) or a fool for throwing away my vote in "the most important election of our lives." No, sorry folks, I voted in 2000, and Bush, Jr. still won. Their sky-is-falling tactics spooked enough people into not voting for third parties so much so that the Reform Party is no more, and the Green and Libertarian Parties might not make the ballot in statewide races.

The two parties in power make it very hard for third party candidates to get on the ballot by a whole host of methods, including but not limited to ballot-access laws and the Commission on Presidential Debates. The Commission on Presidential Debates decides who will be included in the debates, and only included Perot because he was a billionaire who had at least 10% support in polls. In 2004, David Cobb and Michael Badnarik were both arrested for civil disobedience for protesting their exclusion from all of the Presidential Debates. The media barely reported it because they were more interested in reporting this election as an either/or choice instead of doing articles about widespread voter discontent, particularly among the youth.

In the end, Nader only got 400,000 votes this time around. Third parties have been laid low from one of their high points 12 years ago. Third parties are the places where new issues get injected into the political discourse. Much of early 20th century Socialist candidate Eugene V. Debs' platform was adopted by FDR in the 1930s as the New Deal. What ideas will come out of the third party candidates of the early 21st century?
santo26 on 11.11.04 @ 02:32 PM PST [link] [No Comments]

Saturday, November 6th

2004 Presidential Election: Results of Third Party Candidates

Mood: political
Since no major news outlet will give detailed coverage of the full results of the 2004 Election, here are the results as they concern the third party candiates. I compiled this information from Wikipedia, President Elect, and the Los Angeles Times. My congratuations to the million voters who refused to knuckle under to the two-party system.

NameParty# of Votes%Ballot Access
Ralph NaderReform/ Independent 400,7060.34%34 + DC
Michael Badnarik Libertarian 381,2700.33%48 + DC
Michael Peroutka Constitution 130,9860.11%36
David CobbGreen106,2640.09%27 + DC
Leonard PeltierPeace & Freedom 21,6160.02%1
Other VariousN/A 13,0110.01%0
Third Parties Total: 1,053,853 .90% Electoral Votes: 0

santo26 on 11.06.04 @ 06:05 PM PST [link] [2 Comments]

Thursday, November 4th

The 2004 Election: The White State Vote

Music: Herbie Hancock

Yesterday I voted along with millions of my fellow citizens, who chose their sides, red or blue, Bush or Kerry. The difference is that I did not vote for either candidate. I voted for the Libertarian candidate, Michael Badnarik, because I wanted to lodge a protest vote. I wanted no part of this choice. I wanted everyone who reduced this to a red state- blue state thing that to remember that there is a third "color" in the "flag" of the United States: the white state.

I did not think Bush deserved a second term. If the Democratic Party, which has been hijacked by the PC thugs as much as the Republicans have been by the religious right, had run a candidate who I thought presented his case in an inspiring manner, I would have voted for their candidate. Unfortunately, they ran John Kerry.

The ship that is the Democratic Party has been steered onto the rocks by a dedicated minority of liberals. The people who say that this is "the most important election of their lives," I ask you, where were you in 2000? Al Gore playing the victim card instead of having the grace to concede defeat like Richard Nixon in 1960, hobbled Bush's Presidency with this bullshit claim of "illegitimacy" at the time when America most needed credibility. These blue state people look with disdain on the people who live in the red states and have no respect for them. How are you supposed to build a coalition to lead the country if you have contempt for the values of the majority of the population?

I have been reading a lot about Nixon lately, and his "Silent Majority" coalition that finally convinced the South to vote Republican instead of Democrat seems all the more important in light of the recent election.

The Democratic Party ran a Bob Dolean candidate in Kerry- a retread from another age. The younger people need to get involved on all levels in politics, because the people who represents both parties do not represent the values of anyone I know, yet no one will fucking participate! I hope this election persuades all the people who have been whining and complaining for the last 4 years that they have to get off the couch if they want anything to change.

The best thing about this election from a white state perspective is that one of the candidates won by a clear margin, this was reflected in the Electoral College, and the opponent conceded gracefully and without violence, proving to the world that democracy works.

santo26 on 11.04.04 @ 03:39 AM PST [link] [No Comments]

Athena Home

Sawins Pond
The Athenaeum
BSA Troop 30
Audrey Jacks
awiggins: home

November 2004

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!

Powered By Greymatter